«
»

Happy Anniversary Salford Labour Website!

Published by Iain on October 23, 2008 in Salford. 6 Comments

Today is Thursday 23rd October, which means it’s now four months exactly since the Salford Labour Party website was last updated on Monday 23rd June. Happy anniversary! Oh, and poor show.

6 Responses to “Happy Anniversary Salford Labour Website!”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1 Tom Murphy
    Oct 23rd, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Iain,

    Hang on – wasn’t this already reported in point 8 of your lastest ‘Sunday Round-Up’ below?

    I realise repetition is an important device in your oppositionist attack-dog political narrative, but isn’t this stretching it a bit??

    Tom.

  2. 2 Iain
    Oct 23rd, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    As with other occasions Tom, even if you’ve flagged it up previously it’s only polite to post a greeting on the special day itself… :)

  3. 3 joe oenill
    Oct 23rd, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Attack dog political narritive? Got that wrong TOM
    I think that style was actually on the blog it’s self…..

  4. 4 Tom Murphy
    Oct 24th, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Joe,

    As you may have gathered from earlier post on this blog, I have no problem with attacks on other parties – as long as words aren’t needlessly personal, it keeps everyone on their toes and is good for democracy.

    What I can’t abide is Lib Dem posturing that they’re the ‘nice’ party and mud-slinging is beneath them, when they’re actually the trend setter in this regard.

    Tom.

  5. 5 Ian Lewis
    Oct 25th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    lol. At least it hasn’t been removed altogether, unlike the website of the ever-shrinking Wallasey Labour Party:

    http://wallaseylabourcouncillors.com/index.php

  6. 6 Iain
    Oct 27th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    To be honest if you’ve got a blog-style website, it’s better off not there at all than there but not updated, as it is so transparently obvious that it is inactive.

    The Salford Liberal Democrat website was edited the other week after a similar period of inactivity but because it had a static front page it was much less obviously stagnant.

Leave a Reply

«
»