<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do New Roads Not Come With Strings Attached?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/2008/12/02/why-do-new-roads-not-come-with-strings-attached/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/2008/12/02/why-do-new-roads-not-come-with-strings-attached/</link>
	<description>Cllr Iain Lindley - Prospective Conservative MP for Worsley &#38; Eccles South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/2008/12/02/why-do-new-roads-not-come-with-strings-attached/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/?p=667#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>hi Iain, 

i think we must all call for a national debate on how the billions we pay in taxes to use the roads are spent. 
what was it a tenth of what we pay in taxes is reinvested back into the roads. 
to put this con-charge on top without the proper regulation will lead to problems down the line. 
I will say again, this scheme is ill thought out and in its effort to try and appease enough people to vote yes will get mired in beauracracy. (apologies for the spelling)
there are alternatives, but given that leaders switch from discussing their own city, to sub region, and when i try to raise issues that effect the whole connerbation and am told to talk to my city council I dont think the &#039;yes&#039; camp truly want to listen. 
they keep repeating no plan &#039;b&#039;, what type of forward planning is that, oops we should have listened to the people, what are we going to do now.... 
When are the Labour Councillors of Salford who have voted this issue through the city council going to come out and defend it like the likes of Leese and co...or are they afraid of going the same route as Roger Jones. 

Enough ranting... for now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Iain, </p>
<p>i think we must all call for a national debate on how the billions we pay in taxes to use the roads are spent.<br />
what was it a tenth of what we pay in taxes is reinvested back into the roads.<br />
to put this con-charge on top without the proper regulation will lead to problems down the line.<br />
I will say again, this scheme is ill thought out and in its effort to try and appease enough people to vote yes will get mired in beauracracy. (apologies for the spelling)<br />
there are alternatives, but given that leaders switch from discussing their own city, to sub region, and when i try to raise issues that effect the whole connerbation and am told to talk to my city council I dont think the &#8216;yes&#8217; camp truly want to listen.<br />
they keep repeating no plan &#8216;b&#8217;, what type of forward planning is that, oops we should have listened to the people, what are we going to do now&#8230;.<br />
When are the Labour Councillors of Salford who have voted this issue through the city council going to come out and defend it like the likes of Leese and co&#8230;or are they afraid of going the same route as Roger Jones. </p>
<p>Enough ranting&#8230; for now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/2008/12/02/why-do-new-roads-not-come-with-strings-attached/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iainlindley.co.uk/?p=667#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Well Iain living in Tameside myself nothing surprises me anymore with our Labour Council wasting money.
The By Pass has arguements on both sides but for so much money to have been spent on this white elephant and no construction to have taken place is quite shocking a waste of council tax payers money and tax payers money in general.
In fact it&#039;s criminal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Iain living in Tameside myself nothing surprises me anymore with our Labour Council wasting money.<br />
The By Pass has arguements on both sides but for so much money to have been spent on this white elephant and no construction to have taken place is quite shocking a waste of council tax payers money and tax payers money in general.<br />
In fact it&#8217;s criminal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
